Publishing principles
Editorial and evidence policy
See how Solar Funding chooses sources, separates evidence from opinion, corrects pages and handles AI-assisted drafting.
Evidence before certainty
Funding content is unusually time-sensitive — budgets, thresholds and eligibility rules can change without notice. Our guides describe the general shape of a scheme and always point back to the official page for the current figures, rather than presenting our own summary as the decisive answer.
Source order
- GOV.UK and Welsh Government scheme pages — the only decisive source for eligibility and current rules.
- Competition and Markets Authority guidance on unfair commercial practices, and RECC's consumer code.
- Other official UK energy-policy reporting for context.
- Commercial provider material only for clearly labelled examples, never as the sole basis for an eligibility or funding claim.
AI-assisted production
Automated tools may help organise research, draft structures and refresh figures against current sources. A page is not published merely because a tool produced it. Claims must fit the cited sources, duplicate pages are avoided, and metadata must accurately describe the visible content.
Review and corrections
Every guide carries a review date. A changed date should reflect a real review or material edit — scheme thresholds are checked against GOV.UK/Welsh Government pages at each review. Corrections are made in place. Report a problem through the complaints and corrections page.
Commercial separation
Informational ordering is based on user need, not on the commission value of an enquiry. The funding checker and the installer-quote request are kept structurally separate, and any active referral relationship or paid placement must be labelled. An installer cannot buy an unqualified endorsement.